Are big sustainability targets the target?

by Salterbaxter
Download as PDF Are big targets the target?
Exploring the buzz around big targets in sustainability strategy - and why most Nordic companies are still holding their breath.

Three billion lives improved... 50% less water... 100% sustainable fish... a life saved every hour... big numbers and impressive challenges from companies such as P&G, Philips, Unilever and IKEA have made targets the lead story of some of the best-known sustainability strategies in recent years. But do they work?

We've taken the temperature on this debate in Scandinavia and, unsurprisingly, this is what we found: It depends... For some companies big targets seem to work like Kennedy's commitment to put a man on the moon by the end of the 1960s. The very fact that they are daunting and there is no clear plan to achieve them is what gives them power. These ‘Big Hairy Audacious Goals' have undoubtedly become an important part of the language of sustainability leadership, to the point where it's hard to be a frontrunner in sustainable business strategy without them.

But for many Nordic companies, talking about future achievements in such a bold way is deeply counter-cultural, and there's a clear sense that big targets, if they are used at all, can't stand alone. They need connection to the fundamental purpose of the business – and proof points that show how it is contributing positively to society and stakeholders. That explains why many Nordic businesses are busy behind the scenes, working out how they can set ambitious targets that are also based on solid metrics, and have a clear connection to their social purpose.

This Salterbaxter special report explores some of that experience. We look at where some of the leading businesses are positioned on targets, talk to Grundfos about their plans for leadership, and review efforts by a range of companies to put convincing metrics on their sustainability impacts. And we offer eight tricks to learn from the leaders. For a direct link to PDF, click here.

Reproduced on by kind permission of Salterbaxter.

back to overview

Best annual reports

Annual Report on Annual Reports 2019

Report pick

December 2017: Phoenix Mecano
Phoenix Mecano
Stein am Rhein, Switzerland « View our previous picks

Financial sector annual reports

Evaluation - Competition

Annual reports from the financial sector are no longer selected for the Annual Report on Annual Reports competition for consistency, comparability and credibility reasons. That does not imply that there are not (sometimes very) good and improved reports in the sector. On a customized basis, keeps on evaluating and benchmarking financial sector reports.

How is your report doing?

The report scan

How is your report doing? How does your annual report score on all evaluation criteria used for the Annual Report on Annual Reports?

Order a REPORT SCAN. An edited output of desk research done by report analysts, it provides your company (or advisers) with a summary of pluses and minuses for 25 report items and reporting areas.

For more information, click here.

E-mail your order to:

Report, Google and watch

Has a/your report appeared on ReportWatch?

Has a/your (company) report/name been mentioned, watched, rated, ranked, benchmarked, cited on ReportWatch?
Or has ReportWatch been cited with reference to a/your company/report/name?
Type the (company) name followed by ReportWatch (in one word) and see if you get results.


Mike 4 faces's co-founder and ReportWatch kingpin Mike Guillaume wears a few hats, including financial reporting specialist and international economist, and has therefore good vantage points for monitoring companies, reports and management; as well as for watching economies and economics work (or not). Learn more about Mike's experience and expertise here. Read about Mike's work and views, including his recent book "The Seven Deadly Sins of Capitalism", on